Before beginning, it should be noted that when using the term “slavery,” it is a term that doesn’t exist in Islam and carries such heavy, evil connotations because one immediately thinks about what was seen in the West. Islam is no where near similar to what happened in the Western countries, and a more accurate term to use would be “captives of war” or “servant” or “right-hand possession.” In fact, if someone asked what the definition of slavery is, they would say a system where people are forced to work without any rights, compensation, freedom, or way to get out. However, if that is the definition of slavery, then there is absolutely no such thing as slavery in Islam and Muslims believe that such a system is evil and abhorrent and shouldn’t exist. Prophet Muhammad (Peace and Blessings be upon him) said, \u00a0\u201cDo not refer to anyone as \u2018my slave,\u2019 for all of you are the slaves of Allah. Rather, you should refer to him as \u2018my young man.\u2019 The servant should not refer to anyone as \u2018my lord,\u2019 but rather he should refer to him as \u2018my master.\u2019\u201d (Sahih Muslim 2249)<\/p>\r\n
\r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n
Although what is noted above is enough for this argument, it is still worth mentioning that The Sharias rulings on how to obtain and treat captives of war, whether men or women, in general are the most humane out of any other civilization. First of all, the only way to obtain a right-hand possession in Islam is through war. Therefore, you can never make a free man or woman in Islam your captive, as scholars have said that the origin of a human is to be free, as Allah created our father Adam AS as a free man. It is also never based on race, sex, or ethnicity. Rather, captives can only be obtained through a full pledged war. If one just ponders over this ruling, one can see so much wisdom that comes from it. In Islam, there are different options after war, based on the needs of the community. For example:<\/p>\r\n
The captives of wars can be let go (though this is not always ideal, as they could return to fight again or have nowhere to go back to, as seen in the American Civil War in 1861), ransomed for money, exchanged for other prisoners, killed (since they came to kill you too), or taken as right-hand possession. Therefore, in Islam, in caters to such a system where after a war when there is so many losses from both sides, there is a way to regain what it has lost. This is why one can see that all premodern civilizations had to have captives; it was just a necessary aspect of life in order to survive. However, the vital difference that cannot be overlooked is that captives in Islam cannot be beaten, mutilated, killed, or prostituted. They have to eat what you eat, be clothed with what you cloth yourself with, not overworked, etc (Ibn Majah 3690). Therefore, if you wear Gucci, then they wear Gucci. If you eat caviar for breakfast every day, then they eat caviar for breakfast every day. It is essentially like a modern job today; house services for food, clothing, and shelter. This system is no where near close to what we know and think of when we hear about what happened in other societies. For example, if one did beat his or her captive, the Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said that the expiation is to free that captive (Sahih Muslim 1657). It was narrated that one of the Prophet’s (peace and blessings be upon him) companions, \u2018Uthman ibn \u2018Affan, tweaked the ear of a captive of his when he did something wrong, then he said to him after that: “Come and tweak my ear in retaliation.” The captive refused but he insisted, so he started to tweak it slightly, and he said to him: “Do it strongly, for I cannot bear the punishment on the Day of Resurrection.” The captive said: “Like that, O my master? The Day that you fear I fear also.”\u00a0<\/strong>In Islam, captives are guaranteed food and clothing like that of their master’s. It was narrated that when \u2018Abd al-Rahman ibn \u2018Awf walked among his servants, no one could tell him apart from them, because he did not walk ahead of them, and he did not wear anything different from what they wore. It was also narrated that one day \u2018Umar ibn al-Khattab passed by and saw some servants standing and not eating with their master. He got angry and said to their master: What is wrong with people who are selfish towards their servants? Then he called the servants and they ate with them. Moreover, servants could buy their freedom from their master, they have to be treated in a kind and just manner, and they even sometimes had precedence over free men in some matters where that servants excelled in a religious or worldly affair over the free men. Specifically, for female right-hand possessions, if she gives birth to her master’s baby, the baby is free. On top of that, she is also freed automatically when her master dies. These rules ensure that obtained servants in Islam would quickly be able to achieve their freedom, especially after one or two generations. Even in Islam, it is a honorable deed if someone freed a servant that they had out of their kindness, and this was encouraged for the Muslims to do. Contrast this to other societies in history that maintain a permanent, subjugated, and unjust class based on race or ethnicity, Islamic captives of war is not like that. This is why one can see, for example, the Mamluks, who were a ruling class of Muslim servants and the descendants of servants, were given such power and duties, some of who even reached the level of Sultan’s and Amir’s in the Muslim Caliphate. Furthermore, there is \u200ea \u200econcept in Islam called Mukatabah, and that allows a servant to request their freedom, which God encourages in the Quran (Quran 24:33).<\/p>\r\n \r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n Lawrence Keeley wrote a book called War Before Civilization<\/em> where he explains how premodern war was primarily about man power; the side that had the largest army was usually going to win, and if an army was few in numbers, they were an easy target for another army to attack and benefit from them. This is why, as Keeley explains, women were very valuable in premodern civilizations because any society’s ability to reproduce and build up this necessary man power is limited by the number of fertile wombs that society has. Keeley says in his book, “Although the loss of even a large percentage of males will have no direct influence on a group’s demographic fortunes (whatever the effect on its military viability may be), the loss or gain of fertile women can mean the difference between population decline and growth.” This is why Keeley argues that all premodern civilizations took female servants, as this was a necessary aspect of war and life. If you didn’t take female captives of war, your society would be at a major disadvantage militarily, because you can either obtain such captives, or your people would get wiped off the face of the earth; there was no third option. This is why taking female servants was not only morally justified, but it was morally necessary.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n\r\n<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n This is why it is very clear from history and objective statistics\/arguments that female servants were necessary and that the Sharia was able to preserve families, marriages, and the community as a whole in this way. This is why you see that any premodern civilization would have to have female servants, including even Prophets in the Old and New Testaments. On top of all of this, when one looks at the rulings set in place by the Sharia on how to treat captives, it is incredibly fair and just with no oppression being involved.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n To conclude, it should be noted that in Pre-Islamic Arabia, they used to bury their daughters alive, as having a daughter was seen as a disgrace. Women were treated as property with no rights at all. Even in the western world, women were deprived of many of their rights until recently, such as voting. Islam liberated the women, gave them honor, dignity, and their due rights. This is why, despite all of these outrageous, ongoing allegations against the way Islam treats women, most people who convert to Islam are in fact women! When one looks at the evidence, it is very clear that Islam would not only protect captives and honor their dignity, but it would also give them many ways to become free. On top of that, obtaining servants was imperative for a society’s survival and could only come through wars and not by the means of unjust racial discrimination. Allah is truly The All-Knowing, All-Wise.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n And Allah Knows best.<\/p>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"